Add example demonstrating abstract association and inheritance between associations
This commit is contained in:
parent
d56132f4d5
commit
dd7a0536c9
1 changed files with 77 additions and 0 deletions
77
examples/conformance/abstract_assoc.py
Normal file
77
examples/conformance/abstract_assoc.py
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
|
|||
from state.devstate import DevState
|
||||
from bootstrap.scd import bootstrap_scd
|
||||
from framework.conformance import Conformance, render_conformance_check_result
|
||||
from concrete_syntax.textual_od import parser, renderer
|
||||
from concrete_syntax.common import indent
|
||||
from concrete_syntax.plantuml import renderer as plantuml
|
||||
from util.prompt import yes_no, pause
|
||||
|
||||
state = DevState()
|
||||
scd_mmm = bootstrap_scd(state)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Change this:
|
||||
mm_cs = """
|
||||
BaseA:Class {
|
||||
abstract = True;
|
||||
}
|
||||
BaseB:Class {
|
||||
abstract = True;
|
||||
}
|
||||
baseAssoc:Association (BaseA -> BaseB) {
|
||||
abstract = True;
|
||||
target_lower_cardinality = 1;
|
||||
target_upper_cardinality = 2; # A has 1..2 B
|
||||
}
|
||||
A:Class
|
||||
B:Class
|
||||
assoc:Association (A -> B) {
|
||||
# we can further restrict cardinality from baseAssoc:
|
||||
target_upper_cardinality = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
# relaxing cardinalities or constraints can be done (meaning: it will still be a valid meta-model), but will have no effect: for any instance of a type, the constraints defined on the type and its supertypes will be checked.
|
||||
}
|
||||
:Inheritance (A -> BaseA)
|
||||
:Inheritance (B -> BaseB)
|
||||
:Inheritance (assoc -> baseAssoc)
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
print()
|
||||
print("Parsing meta-model...")
|
||||
mm = parser.parse_od(
|
||||
state,
|
||||
m_text=mm_cs, # the string of text to parse
|
||||
mm=scd_mmm, # the meta-model of class diagrams (= our meta-meta-model)
|
||||
)
|
||||
print("OK")
|
||||
|
||||
print("Is our meta-model a valid class diagram?")
|
||||
conf = Conformance(state, mm, scd_mmm)
|
||||
print(render_conformance_check_result(conf.check_nominal()))
|
||||
|
||||
# Change this:
|
||||
m_cs = """
|
||||
a0:A
|
||||
b0:B
|
||||
b1:B
|
||||
|
||||
# error: assoc (A -> B) must have tgt card 0..1 (and we have 2 instead)
|
||||
:assoc (a0 -> b0)
|
||||
:assoc (a0 -> b1)
|
||||
|
||||
# error: baseAssoc (A -> B) must have tgt card 1..2 (and we have 0 instead)
|
||||
a1:A
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
print()
|
||||
print("Parsing model...")
|
||||
m = parser.parse_od(
|
||||
state,
|
||||
m_text=m_cs,
|
||||
mm=mm, # this time, the meta-model is the previous model we parsed
|
||||
)
|
||||
print("OK")
|
||||
|
||||
print("Is our model a valid woods-diagram?")
|
||||
conf = Conformance(state, m, mm)
|
||||
print(render_conformance_check_result(conf.check_nominal()))
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue